We stand at a place that marks a time in history that pivots the determination of one’s worth, … that it be of dignity or … that it be without.

When one’s own being may be subject to the desire of another it follows that there is no control over their own life, and that which follows is one where there is no place in life for hope, desire and aspiration of fulfilment. So goes the course of a nation when its voice is not free to be heard.

We must be vigilant and ask ourselves:

• Are we free to examine the conduct of government and voice our concerns when they become of concern?
• Are we free to have open discussion on issue that affect our lives without interference and direction by others, especially government?
• Do we have a duty to be vigilant and concern ourselves with civic duty of understanding the law?

The answer to those questions is found in the meaning of ‘complacency’ and the outcome that occurs because of it.
‍
The history of nations are replete with events that defines the struggle between imposing powers and a society.  What is sought is an advantage of a few over the many. What is sold is a diversion to gain an advantage. That advantage is dressed to be a necessary need. And the agents of that message are discretely rewarded by wealth and honours.

Our Commonwealth is a service, like that of the watchman who’s duty is to look out for impending danger and warn the community of that which may await them. There needs to be sufficient warning of the pitfalls.

This service, for the Australian community, relies on the evidence amassed, and the law discerned, over several decades and is presented for open evaluation and frank discussion so that it may be known whether measures ought to be undertaken to avert danger and conflict and promote the information widely to the benefit of the community.

Our Commonwealth is a noticeboard for the audit of the governments that administer the affairs of our society. Our Commonwealth operates as a health check up or a maintenance schedule to inspect for concerns and provide assurance that the affairs of the community are in good order.

The author, in review of more than two decades of research and correspondence, believes the Australian people are due a report of affairs concerning their respective governments and judicial system.

The author relies heavily on information contained in official documents and the inconsistencies to the text of the law that is presumed to be followed. The Australian people are owed the full and open account of the machinery of the governments and courts that affect their lives if the intention of a society is one that is based on rights and freedom.

It is fundamental that the right to vote is synonymous with freedom, as the right to choose equates with the position of being superiour in the master-servant relationship, wherefrom the servant does not choose the master, in following the rule that; He who obeys the command is the servant.

The author believes that all Australians would be well served in becoming familiar with the contents of this ‘service’ so as to understand the legal state of affairs that impact upon their daily lives in Australia. Many may be alarmed at the information within to learn that the stated public narrative does not match the law, nor the true legal position for authority, advanced by most sections of government administrations.

The beginning of wisdom begins with calling things by their true name

The central issue for all to be concerned with is the meaning of the term, the Commonwealth of Australia, and the term, Australia. The constitution provides the brevity of the name the ‘Commonwealth of Australia’ is to be ‘the Commonwealth’

Here, the purposeful dropping of the term, ‘the Commonwealth of’,  is where the camouflage of deception lies. Here is where the removal of the people’s authority occurred. Here, is where the inversion of the people’s trust, the Commonwealth, was deceptively concealed. Here, is where there has failed to be sufficient notice that the institutions in government have changed to the detriment and disadvantage of the people.

Here, is where attention ought to be directed for scrutiny and open disclosure that would seem that the Whitlam government, in 1973, substituted their authority over that of the people. If that were the case then the name change to the Commonwealth may not have had to happen even though the Commonwealth refers to the people. What eventuated was, in fact, more sinister.

To avoid the criminality of their actions and remove the judiciary from taking remedial steps and the possibilities of convictions for those who were in the unlawful revolution of Her Majesty’s government in overturning the Commonwealth scheme, there had to be a wholesale departure from it.

Enter the formation of a new society with a similar name to that departed from. This society would be formed directly under the government’s authority as a new beginning that had no involvement of the people and as it had no constitution at inception, the plan would go to adopt the constitution for the Commonwealth for appearances. The inconsistencies and irregularities would somehow have to be avoided by clever and imprecise interpretation by the courts which would be brought under the same scheme and be compromised if the were to rule in the effect of finding their judicial authority to be out of order. The courts would be now compelled to rule in favour of their self-serving interests.

Hence the Scheme ‘Australia’ was born without its own constitution, pretending authority under the term, ‘Australian Government’, a novel and diverse jurisdiction to that of the Commonwealth. And because of this new venue, called Australia, crimes against the Commonwealth could not be committed. Everyone, henceforth, was to be loyal to Australia, aka Australian Government.

This author asked of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet for the document of sufficient notice in announcing this wholesale change from the Commonwealth to Australia. The answer came back that it did not exist.

This, Our Commonwealth, publishing service has a mandate under Commonwealth law, a warrant at the fifth clause to inform the Australian people what has been concealed from them, in open sight, and allow the people to take steps in restoring the rule of law which includes the authority of the people, their monarch, and their trust, sadly betrayed.

NP

God Save the Queen, God Save the Commonwealth.

‍